| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 18:26 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 |
> We have a fair number of packages in the tree (57 someone said, but a |
| 3 |
> non-trivial number) which depend upon sys-apps/acl for ACL support. |
| 4 |
> Since the packages needed for this differ between platforms |
| 5 |
> (sys-apps/acl is for linux only), if noone has any reasonable |
| 6 |
> objections I will be adding a (new-style) virtual/acl for these packages |
| 7 |
> sometime in the next week or so. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This email brought to you on behalf of Flameeyes. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In your own words what benefit does this have over |
| 13 |
kernel_linux? ( acl? ( sys-apps/acl )) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
What acl packages exists for these other platforms? |
| 16 |
Do they use the same API? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives