| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 06/02/13 08:55 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 6 |
>> I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them |
| 7 |
>> are using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and |
| 8 |
>> there is no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to use |
| 9 |
>> it. Which one is the correct one and why do we have both? The |
| 10 |
>> following guide only mentions /var/run |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> We should be migrating to /run at this point. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> http://goo.gl/hrWcN |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I had thought /var/run was supposed to be compatibility a symlink to |
| 18 |
/run now ? Is that the case or should /var/run be eliminated from |
| 19 |
systems? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
(I realize this is a tangent to the original post) |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlESYUIACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBUyQEArLfQfeUnW510aizYrjlHcGRl |
| 26 |
fjHoZOnHdC10O2Sam6UBALOedX+jKZb5wig4xI/l6lEtFOUVOLNcPU69kk3cpEsU |
| 27 |
=aueY |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives