Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:55:43
Message-Id: 1334426068.3181.11.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree by Alexis Ballier
1 El sáb, 14-04-2012 a las 12:42 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
2 > On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:02:27 +0200
3 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 > > Hello
6 > >
7 > > From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly opened
8 > > and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would be possible
9 > > to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring in summary to
10 > > obsolete packages and, then, allow us to have a cleaner bug list?
11 >
12 > -1, you really cant automate this.
13 >
14 > - for eg, keyword req, the version doesnt really matter and is usually
15 > just there to help but should really be read as latest version;
16 > closing/ignoring the bug while the latest version still lacks the
17 > keywords is just wrong.
18 > - for stablereq, that's a different story
19 >
20 > - for other bugs, some may have been fixed independently upstream, but
21 > usually, they dont fix by themselves, so if a bug didnt get
22 > attention, chances are its still valid.
23 >
24 >
25 > moreover, doing this, you'll just encourage people not to fill the
26 > version
27 >
28 >
29 > IOW: If you want a cleaner bug list, ignore stable/kw reqs, then pay
30 > attention to your bugs and fix them :)
31 >
32 > A.
33 >
34 >
35
36 It's not for versions, only package names (there are still bugs
37 referring to already removed packages for months)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies