| 1 |
Am 27.05.2013 22:38, schrieb Anthony G. Basile: |
| 2 |
> Hi everyone, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I was about to add a use expand flag for monkeyd (a tiny web server) and |
| 5 |
> there is a notice in base/make.default to discuss use expand flags on |
| 6 |
> the list first. There are about 9 plugins for monkeyd similar to apache |
| 7 |
> which can be turned on/off by a configure switch. It makes sense to |
| 8 |
> follow the same logic as apache here. There are no dependencies on |
| 9 |
> monkeyd and so no use-deps. Seems very safe. Any objections? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> --Tony |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Some time ago, Zac proposed a general PLUGIN (or PLUGINS) use-expand, |
| 15 |
which could be used for packages with a small amount of plugins to avoid |
| 16 |
having a new USE_EXPAND for each and every package. It also has the |
| 17 |
advantage, that the resulting useflag 'plugins_foobar' is sane enough |
| 18 |
(opposed to 'monkeyd_plugins_foobar'). With this, it serves as a quite |
| 19 |
nice compromise for the fraction of USE_EXPAND-dislikers (like me). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Unfortunately this did not get any real discussion. So could this |
| 22 |
package be an option to start this? Or do you insist on |
| 23 |
monkeyd_{plugins,modules,...}_ ? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
René |
Archives