| 1 |
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:15:32 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Spider <spider@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > So, I know it isn't foolproof, don't expect it to be. However, |
| 6 |
> > feedback would be nice, patches and so on. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I think that for binaries you could filter the ldd output to keep |
| 9 |
> only the libs that are directly linked to, since that's what |
| 10 |
> should really become dependencies. See atttached patch for a |
| 11 |
> possible quick and dirty implementation. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Thanks, Applied said quick&dirty implementation, committing as well :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
//Spider |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
begin .signature |
| 19 |
Tortured users / Laughing in pain |
| 20 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 21 |
end |
Archives