| 1 |
On Thursday 18 May 2006 13:25, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote: |
| 2 |
> Was this discussed on gentoo-dev mailinglist before committing to the |
| 3 |
> tree? Eclasses are supposed to be discussed on -dev prior to adding |
| 4 |
> them to the tree to catch any (obvious) mistakes etc. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> This is particularly important for eclasses as they can't be removed or |
| 7 |
> changed in incompatible ways later due to the way portage handles them. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't have time to look at it myself right now but I'd still |
| 10 |
> appreciate posting the code to gentoo-dev and have other devs/users |
| 11 |
> comment on it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It has not been. As far as I know such a requirement does not exist. In |
| 14 |
any case, this eclass only provides utility functions to find the proper |
| 15 |
location of berkeley db. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 23 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives