| 1 |
On 08/09/2012 12:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:20:52 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 08/09/2012 10:57 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> No. I meant to have 'GNU' tools with 'GNU' stripped. Isn't that what |
| 7 |
>>> the whole discussion is about? Changing names of tools just for |
| 8 |
>>> someone's liking? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> No, we are discussing about an upstream merging two unrelated projects |
| 11 |
>> assuring users that nothing would change for them. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> In a week they claimed that it was unsupported, then backpedaled, then |
| 14 |
>> they changed its paths. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Forking udev hadn't been considered mostly just on that premise. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> So someone should just *finally* fork it, rather than talking about it |
| 19 |
> all the time. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I had that[1] since ages, mostly because I was curious about how complex |
| 22 |
udev is internally. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If enough people want to play this game welcome. I expect the same |
| 25 |
people stomping on mdev complaining about the next little experiment. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
https://github.com/lu-zero/udev |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
lu |
Archives