| 1 |
that is my doing back when gcc3.4 was profile masked, i could even |
| 2 |
boostrap with it at the time |
| 3 |
it was only an escape to make gcc3.4 ~x86 w/o anyone pulling it but |
| 4 |
those who chose to switch to |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
default-linux/x86/2004.2/gcc34/2.6/ |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
>On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 15:33 +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>>On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:26:03AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>>>You are correct in that the virtuals file is read. The easiest way |
| 18 |
>>>would be for you to create your own profile and use that instead. |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>Ok! Thanks a lot. You tried the same as me, and got the same results. Now I |
| 22 |
>>understand the virtuals 'cascade'. But I think I could use profile |
| 23 |
>>"default-linux/x86/2004.2/gcc34/2.6/", isn't it? Anyway, using it, emerge keeps |
| 24 |
>>on trying to get linux-headers for 2.4. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>There is no profile in portage using 2.6 headers as default that I am |
| 29 |
>aware of. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>>(By now, I changed the virtuals in default-linux/x86 and default-linux). That |
| 34 |
>>isn't very pretty... but that's what I did. ;) |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
>You probably would have done better to have created a sub-profile of |
| 39 |
>default-linux/x86/2004.3 to suit your needs. You would have only have |
| 40 |
>had to have changed the virtuals file to include "virtual/os-headers |
| 41 |
>linux26-headers" |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives