| 1 |
Dnia 2014-07-26, o godz. 15:01:46 |
| 2 |
Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> The idea is to act "as usual", just to skip unnecessary phases... |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > So someone adds optional selinux support to a package, and then you end |
| 9 |
> > up with selinux being "on", despite not having it, and then another |
| 10 |
> > package depends upon your package with [selinux], and the dependency is |
| 11 |
> > mistakenly treated as met... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If the developer has added IUSE=selinux and bumps from -r1 to -r1.1, |
| 14 |
> he has of course verified that this USE-change does not require |
| 15 |
> recompilation either way, since otherwise he would not have been |
| 16 |
> allowed to explicitly say the package manager that recompilation |
| 17 |
> is unnecessary. |
| 18 |
> So the dependency is *correctly* treated as met. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Excuse me but are we talking about updating *DEPEND or IUSE? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives