From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | ||
Date: | Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:38:26 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130430173803.0522c7e5@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? by Ulrich Mueller |
1 | On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:25:08 +0200 |
2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
4 | > |
5 | > > Below is a patch that brings the spec in line with common sense. |
6 | > |
7 | > And in fact, I wonder why we're even discussing the issue. |
8 | > Paludis was fixed already more than a year ago: |
9 | > http://git.exherbo.org/paludis/paludis.git/commit/?id=ad2ae2ba3b6fc8f113638a86de0e7d8a6a046091 |
10 | |
11 | We're discussing a matter of principle... |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |