| 1 |
Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
| 2 |
> First of all, I'm not sure why devrel was involved in a technical |
| 3 |
> decision without actually having all the interested parties there, but |
| 4 |
> aside from that, when Gentoo developers become a bunch of 5 year olds? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> What is this absolute nonsense of "you don't like my toy, you can't have |
| 7 |
> your toy" going on around here? Jakub, if you will disrupt others |
| 8 |
> because you can't have your way, then please reconsider exactly what |
| 9 |
> your role is in this project, and maybe even how you might better serve |
| 10 |
> some other project. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I believe that jakub finds this devrel decision a step out of bounds |
| 14 |
(not sure if anyone else detected the that in his statement) and saying |
| 15 |
that to the java folks is moreso a way of pointing out just how silly it |
| 16 |
is :) I mean if he was serious, he would have addressed the PHP |
| 17 |
overlay, the webapps overlay...etc... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> This childishness from *all* sides is getting really old, really fast. |
| 20 |
> People need to grow the hell up, and quit with the melodrama. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Seemant |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Look, I was on IRC yesterday, the whole thing was a mess. For once I'm |
| 25 |
not going to step on devrels balls for this one. Someone had to do |
| 26 |
something. For once I'm tired of *someone acting* and then getting |
| 27 |
nailed for it because its not their place. Am I thrilled with the |
| 28 |
outcome? No not really. Apparently neither is Jakub. Thats all fine. |
| 29 |
Can always overturn it later. Or we can discuss it endlessly here |
| 30 |
with no outcome, or we can make the council decide on what the proper |
| 31 |
use of bugzilla is. Or we can all realize that we can't get our way all |
| 32 |
the time and compromise with other projects*. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
* Including projects currently suspended. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-Alec |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives