| 1 |
mån 2009-12-14 klockan 19:03 -0500 skrev Mike Frysinger: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 14 December 2009 18:38:36 Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:46:18 +0100 Diego E. Pettenò wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > # Diego E. Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> (13 Dec 2009) |
| 5 |
> > > # on behalf of QA team |
| 6 |
> > > # |
| 7 |
> > > # Pre-strip files (bug #241534), ignore flags (bug #241556), |
| 8 |
> > > # misplaces documentation (bug #241560), bump request open |
| 9 |
> > > # since August 2008 (bug #235888). |
| 10 |
> > > # |
| 11 |
> > > # Removal on 2010-02-11 |
| 12 |
> > > x11-wm/ion |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Really? Does it not build or something? That's pretty weak. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> yeah, "not clean enough" doesnt really imply pmask+punt. if it build fails, |
| 17 |
> that's a different story. |
| 18 |
> -mike |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
On the other hand this may be something for treecleaners? A package that |
| 21 |
has not been bumped for 7 years? With at least three releases since, and |
| 22 |
a bumprequest open for at least one year? A link to a webside that does |
| 23 |
not exist? |
| 24 |
Sound like a Gentoo maintainer gone MIA or alike. |
| 25 |
Also the project is currently more or less dead upstream since the |
| 26 |
upstream dev switched to windows. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
So I see diegos point in giving it two months to be picked up by someone |
| 29 |
that may want to use it/maintain it. |
Archives