Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:43:48
Message-Id: 4E34B291.1080807@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook? by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
1 On 07/31/2011 03:59 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
2 > On 30-07-2011 22:17, William Hubbs wrote:
3 >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
4 >>> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on
5 >>> top of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long
6 >>> time now[1][2][3]
7 >>>
8 >>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364235 [2]
9 >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove#Move_all_to_.2Fusr
10 >>> [3]
11 >>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
12 >>>
13 >>>
14 >>>
15 > Can we warn users about not doing the separate /usr mistake in the handbook?
16 >
17 >> There are actually two options for us according to upstream. One is
18 >> the one you are talking about -- mounting /usr from an initramfs
19 >> before / is mounted. The other is to mount local file systems, if
20 >> setups are simple enough, before we start udev. I could set this one
21 >> up easily enough just by moving localmount to the boot runlevel.
22 >
23 >> Can we discuss both options?
24 > If there's any option that allows the use of a separate /usr partition
25 > without an initramfs, then let's explore it. I don't feel like having to
26 > use an initramfs just because I want a small / without /usr on it.
27
28 The message is really missing all the context without explanation for
29 WHY you want it.

Replies