1 |
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:16 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt |
2 |
<gentoo@×××××××.xyz> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On 09/02/20 20:59, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: |
5 |
> > On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: |
6 |
> >> On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: |
7 |
> >>> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: |
8 |
> >>>> Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of |
9 |
> >>>> Manifest?! |
10 |
> >>> Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments |
11 |
> >>> everywhere, all the time and just get irritated for no benefit to |
12 |
> >>> Gentoo? |
13 |
> >>> |
14 |
> >> There's a really simple method to deal with that .. would you like me to |
15 |
> >> explain, or would that be 'useless' too? |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> > For the benefit of other readers, it's clear Michal is incapable of |
18 |
> > implementing the measures I am thinking of .. or simply isn't aware of what |
19 |
> > they might be? |
20 |
> > which is quite unusual for a developer of his supposed capability ... |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> For the avoidance of doubt, whilst my ban from this list is enacted, here |
23 |
> is the list of "Unacceptable behaviour" from the Gentoo Code of Conduct[1]. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> "Deciding to suspend or ban someone isn't a decision to be taken lightly, |
26 |
> but sometimes it has to happen. Below is a list of things that could result |
27 |
> in disciplinary action. * Flaming and trolling. What is trolling? You are |
28 |
> deemed to be trolling if you make comments intended to provoke an angry |
29 |
> response from others. What is flaming? Flaming is the act of sending or |
30 |
> posting messages that are deliberately hostile and insulting. |
31 |
> * Posting/participating only to incite drama or negativity rather than to |
32 |
> tactfully share information. |
33 |
> * Being judgmental, mean-spirited or insulting. It is possible to |
34 |
> respectfully challenge someone in a way that empowers without being |
35 |
> judgemental. |
36 |
> * Constantly purveying misinformation despite repeated warnings." |
37 |
> |
38 |
> It is left as an exercise for the reader, who is transgressing here... |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
"Technically I'm not violating the rules" is the weakest argument. |
42 |
|
43 |
Can you just please save everyone the headache of litigating this and |
44 |
act a little more professional and a little less silly on the mailing |
45 |
list? (And on IRC if I'm asking) |
46 |
|
47 |
Here's a good approximation to determine whether your mail is worth |
48 |
sending: before you press send, ask yourself if the person you're |
49 |
replying to gains anything by reading your reply. If the answer is on |
50 |
the range "unlikely" to "no", then just don't send the reply. |