| 1 |
I think this is the best explination of it : |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-3.12.html |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
since we dont "add on" either KDE or Gnome I say... Give the man a |
| 6 |
balloon. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
compare with this though: |
| 10 |
<quote> |
| 11 |
Large software packages must not use a direct subdirectory under the |
| 12 |
/usr hierarchy. |
| 13 |
</quote> |
| 14 |
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-4.1.html |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
//Spider |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
begin quote |
| 21 |
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:37:35 -0600 |
| 22 |
Collins <erichey2@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> Just finished a lengthy interchange wih a "gentleman" (loosely |
| 25 |
> speaking) on another group this weekend. Said gentleman considers |
| 26 |
> himself to be a chief priest of the fhs religion, and he says that he |
| 27 |
> wouldn't touch gentoo with a fork because gnome and kde are in the |
| 28 |
> /usr hierarchy instead of the /opt hierarchy "where god intended them |
| 29 |
> to be." |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Just curious, is he all wet, or is this a conscious departure from the |
| 32 |
> fhs requirements? |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> -- |
| 35 |
> Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD? |
| 36 |
> gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla |
| 37 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 40 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
begin .signature |
| 45 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 46 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 47 |
end |
Archives