| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 09:04 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> it was part joke and part seriousness ... i already have my commits scripted |
| 3 |
> with echangelog/repoman, but that isnt the point |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Ok - a bit hard to tell that you were joking there... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> i delete one version for being old, stabilize another ebuild, and add yet |
| 8 |
> another ebuild as a rev bump |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Those are three different things and should be treated as such - also |
| 11 |
when committing. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> which does not matter if you commit individual files firest with different |
| 14 |
> messages before running your bash funcs |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Committing files without using repoman? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> it also pollutes the cvs log history for files ... if i make different fixes |
| 19 |
> to different files but only commit with one message, you easily get a lot of |
| 20 |
> noise |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Same goes for the ChangeLog: if you do multiple commits with your |
| 23 |
proposal, all commits get their own ChangeLog entry. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> not everyone uses echangelog |
| 26 |
[snip] |
| 27 |
> it does, but not everyone uses echangelog |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Why not? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> heaven forbid you get a joke and laugh once in a while |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Jokes and sarcasm doesn't work well in e-mails, sorry. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
./Brix |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
| 38 |
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd |
Archives