Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Incomplete IUSE for useflags in {,R,P}DEPEND, SRC_URI etc...
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:40:44
Message-Id: 44B4FADE.1080508@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Incomplete IUSE for useflags in {,R,P}DEPEND, SRC_URI etc... by Danny van Dyk
1 Danny van Dyk wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > thanks to djm's efforts i was just able to scan the whole tree using
5 > qualudis. For a start, i'll attach a list of QA violations on missing
6 > entries in IUSE. As this is a minor change to the ebuilds, I'll go on
7 > and fix all the listed ebuilds myself.
8 >
9 > There are 505 ebuilds which are missing use flags in IUSE that they use
10 > in other places.
11 >
12 > Danny
13
14 Wrt the pcmcia thing, well not really ebuilds' fault, see
15 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122868
16
17 There are already bugs filed for some of the rest, please go fix them ;)
18
19 http://tinyurl.com/glq4m
20 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136953
21
22 The arch stuff (x86, amd64...) - well I don't really think they should
23 be in IUSE. Here's a log for the rest, without the arch flags:
24
25 http://dev.gentoo.org/~jakub/reports/20061712/unstated_flags.log
26
27
28 --
29 Best regards,
30
31 Jakub Moc
32 mailto:jakub@g.o
33 GPG signature:
34 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
35 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
36
37 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies