| 1 |
On Friday 11 January 2008, Kumba wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > that certainly sounds reasonable to me. if the stable cant be |
| 4 |
> > maintained, let the common workflow of developers transition it back to |
| 5 |
> > ~arch until someone has the time to keep arch usable. changing |
| 6 |
> > profiles.desc accordingly should be done ahead of time. perhaps a new |
| 7 |
> > category for profiles.desc ? "exp" for such ports ? i could see all |
| 8 |
> > *-fbsd ports being moved there. tweak repoman to be less verbose about |
| 9 |
> > dep issues for such profiles and we're set. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Sounds like a plan. 'exp' would be the 'status' field? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
yeah. i'll fork a new thread on the topic. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > i see dropping keywords as a very last resort. getting a port *back* |
| 16 |
> > into the tree is a *tremendous* amount of work (i went through it and it |
| 17 |
> > was hell), while keeping ~arch alive is a sliver of effort and generally |
| 18 |
> > not a blocker for package maintainers. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Aye, I believe that was sh's removal and subsequent re-add? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
arm actually. i blame solar. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
thanks Kumba, i'd wager my left one that without you there would be no mips. |
| 25 |
-mike |
Archives