Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: George Shapovalov <george@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS alternatives -- meta-cvs
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:54:36
Message-Id: 200401311050.25679.george@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] CVS alternatives -- meta-cvs by Grant Goodyear
1 Hi guys.
2
3 I noticed osnews mentions an overview article of various kinds of VCS'es. It
4 does not really go into the scalability on any of these, so it is probably of
5 limited use to the issue at hand, but it seems to give a decent run over the
6 features of different systems.
7 Here is the link to the article:
8 http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/01/29/scm_overview.html
9
10 George
11
12 On Tuesday 27 January 2004 16:39, Grant Goodyear wrote:
13 > A recent thread discussed alternatives to CVS. As our developers know
14 > all too well (but some -dev readers may not), the portage tree is kept
15 > in CVS, which serves us reasonably well until somebody wants to move
16 > files around, rename files, or create symbolic links, all of which are a
17 > real hassle.
18 [skipped]
19 > Best,
20 > g2boojum
21
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list