Archives
Archives
| From: | Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] impending c++11 clusterfuck? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:58:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87egf6pmru.fsf@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] impending c++11 clusterfuck? by "Anthony G. Basile" |
||
| 1 | Hi Anthony, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> writes: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > different direction: what about building with |
| 6 | > rpath=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/ and then making sure that |
| 7 | > portage respects that library file during any --depclean or |
| 8 | > @preserved-rebuild? i'm not sure how we'd |
| 9 | > inject|||LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath=... consistantly and sanely into all c++ builds. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | FYI, Gentoo Prefix injects "LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath=" with a wrapper of ld. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Benda |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] impending c++11 clusterfuck? | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |