Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Göktürk Yüksek" <gokturk@××××××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] ebuild-writing/misc-files: remove ChangeLog section #485314
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 04:19:29
Message-Id: 56A84544.6010207@binghamton.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] ebuild-writing/misc-files: remove ChangeLog section #485314 by Ulrich Mueller
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 Ulrich Mueller:
5 >>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
6 >
7 >> The ChangeLog page is nonsense as-is, and removing it makes the
8 >> devmanual better. Afterwards, if someone wants to take the commit
9 >> message guidelines from the wiki and merge them with the old
10 >> ChangeLog tips, great. There's only two things worth salvaging
11 >> from the ChangeLog page. Here's the combined list:
12 >
13 >> 1. Everything from the Git workflow wiki page "Commit message
14 >> format" section.
15 >
16 > I would say not only that section, but most of the page. The
17 > devmanual is the one central place where our development workflow
18 > should be documented, not some random wiki page.
19 >
20 If the most up-to-date information is on the wiki, constantly updating
21 devmanual to match the wiki creates unnecessary maintenance burden.
22
23 >> 2. Mention the "Gentoo-Bug:" identifier.
24 >
25 > Right. (But had we settled for "Gentoo-Bug:"? IIRC, last time this
26 > was discussed there was no consensus.)
27 >
28 Related to my point above, looks like the git workflow is still in the
29 process of making. I expect that some discussion will continue to take
30 place in the future. We can always fix the other parts of the
31 devmanual and come back to this.
32
33 Is it possible to merge this changeset as is while the workflow
34 matures, or should I go for a round 3?
35
36 >> Using "bug #12345" in the commit message itself causes trouble.
37 >> If you word-wrap on the "#12345", it will silently clobber the
38 >> message.
39 >
40 > That's one of the reasons why I have 'commentchar = ";"' in my
41 > .gitconfig file. (Not sure if that option would be worth mentioning
42 > in our documentation, though.)
43 >
44 >> [...]
45 >
46 > Ulrich
47 >
48
49 - --
50 gokturk
51
52 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
53
54 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWqEU2AAoJEIT4AuXAiM4zwCAH/3q8FQB+zX0q1kuXjJfYnF3j
55 IvJ2uKjuHMfbSAoGy2bUGEEhsvXGpNTmLv7vDIiHILCeLR0mD1eAmWHuJjjUSmJx
56 PyK6kAPaXX++E5aZ9gRuXqNFSGqiNx3oPvzQs0SH6vXgVec8fpmRk6y/Dg2r20Am
57 hfJLPIeD8Z9Vf/0wM7EcjiS3eVYrTnYCX+aGAKpgk74zKHcnHTL9S77no0Lemby1
58 vlCK9ceouVd6OYdDcvjNg73umlci7JIenCZCU3nagloGwvH6XDFWdGkWSRLQ0G7T
59 DoZlysM2Litafjr7NgyQ7R8xp1HnR+tmWfY26urIPd4rKU+aA05kPnQiTjgKTHo=
60 =UDYD
61 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies