1 |
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:24:26 -0400 |
2 |
Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
> >>>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild |
9 |
> >> versions than ${PV}. |
10 |
> >> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > And multiply number and total size of files in ${FILESDIR}? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Or just rename it ${PN}-bar.patch instead of ${P}-bar.patch if it is a |
16 |
> patch for more than one ebuild version. |
17 |
|
18 |
And when the patch has to be changed? ${PN}-foo-2.patch? |
19 |
|
20 |
The PV in the patch name indicates what version the patch was made |
21 |
for. This can be useful info, if just for judging how bad you are at |
22 |
sending patches upstream. ;) |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
27 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
28 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |