From: | "Paweł Hajdan | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: pym/portage/dbapi/ | ||
Date: | Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:37:50 | ||
Message-Id: | 4ED0CF5F.70908@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/portage:master commit in: pym/portage/dbapi/ by Nirbheek Chauhan |
1 | On 11/26/11 12:26 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 | > If it should be sorted[1], it should really be sorted in the reverse |
3 | > order of distfile-download size. That would be extremely useful on |
4 | > systems with slow internet connections. [...] |
5 | > |
6 | > 1. I'm obviously assuming that dep nodes that do not depend on each |
7 | > other would be sorted |
8 | |
9 | Seconded. I think practical reasons are more important than an arbitrary |
10 | order, and I'd also benefit from this download-oriented order. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |