| 1 |
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:34:49 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Once that is supported, I'm also sure that those people involved will |
| 4 |
| be more than happy to fix their ebuilds to use those features. I do |
| 5 |
| agree with them though that the distribution should not be held back |
| 6 |
| by missing features in portage. Especially since those features have |
| 7 |
| been missing (recognized as such) for ages. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So until then, it's perfectly OK to screw over our users and fellow |
| 10 |
developers by committing any arbitrary mess to the tree and claiming |
| 11 |
that it's alright because Portage doesn't offer a perfect alternative? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) |
| 15 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 16 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives