1 |
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:51:31PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:41:43 +0200 Harald van Dijk <truedfx@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | I then said that *you* say there can be legitimate reasons for them. |
5 |
> | So why do *I* have to come up with examples of it? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Well that's just it. I didn't say there were legitimate reasons, I just |
8 |
> didn't commit myself to saying that there weren't. |
9 |
|
10 |
Fair enough, but if you read "can" as "could" in my posts, they still |
11 |
make sense. |
12 |
|
13 |
Two reasons for CVS ebuilds that aren't hardmasked, by the way: |
14 |
|
15 |
One: see emacs-cvs-22*; it's more reliable than the emacs-22* snapshot. |
16 |
(Something like this is only for ~arch.) |
17 |
Two: when a specific revision is wanted, but snapshots aren't possible |
18 |
for legal reasons. (This could even be marked stable.) |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |