| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 10 July 2004 02:00 am, Chris W wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >>>53738 nor P2 All kde@g.o NEW |
| 7 |
> >>> kdegraphics-3.2.3 ebuild has compile errors |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53738 |
| 10 |
> Precisely no comments after the initial report. Might be a problem, |
| 11 |
> might not. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
1 person.. Not reproducable.. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> >>>53832 blo P2 x86 kde@g.o NEW |
| 16 |
> >>> kdeaddons 3.2.3 fails to compile |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53832 |
| 19 |
> Provides a manual fix to a problem. The problem might be environmental, |
| 20 |
> or it might be a build order dependency. Is this what you want of a |
| 21 |
> stable package? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Might.. Key word. You don't know.. Celeb would, why don't you ask him?? Oh |
| 24 |
thats right, I did.. He told me kde 3.2.3 is ready for stable, he has just |
| 25 |
been too busy.. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Sounds to be like he disagree's.. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> So, we have a collection of NEW (not CLOSED, RESOLVED etc.) bugs overtly |
| 30 |
> against KDE 3.2.3. Some haven't been commented on since they were |
| 31 |
> reported. Others have been dealt with by manual workarounds that would |
| 32 |
> not necessarily be acceptable of an ebuild marked stable. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
No attitude.. Your just wrong here. Its not what I think, nor Celeb. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> To say that, "Celeb has already delt with them," is simply not accurate. |
| 37 |
> (I make no judgement on Caleb or the others that have commented). |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Maybe so.. Maybe not. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> Now, it's my turn to make a suggestion: lose the attitude and run KDE |
| 42 |
> 3.2.3 as-is (i.e. unstable) and provide feedback on the glitches so that |
| 43 |
> confidence in stability is bolstered. You could even help by clearing |
| 44 |
> these bugs. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Your right.. Its moving into stable in 2 days max as I see it. This 30 day |
| 47 |
wait and all. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Like I said.. you guys keep fighting with me. Its funny how Celeb agree's with |
| 50 |
me, And you guys don't. I respect he is to busy. I just asked how I could |
| 51 |
help.. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
Your also all going on and on about kde.. I said other packahes suffer the |
| 54 |
same fait. Well over 30 days.. I guess you guys just dont want to look into |
| 55 |
this. You just want to fight with me since your all right, and I am wrong. I |
| 56 |
was here to offer help in this situation, you wanted to argue and throw your |
| 57 |
weight around on how I seem to have no clue on how anything works around |
| 58 |
here. The 30 day wait period was the only thing I learned from this, other |
| 59 |
then most of the dev's want to argue symantecs, over having gentoo be a |
| 60 |
better distro. |
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
Jeff |
| 63 |
- -- |
| 64 |
======================================================================= |
| 65 |
Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) |
| 66 |
Quote: The will to be stupid is a very powerful force. |
| 67 |
======================================================================= |
| 68 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 69 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
iD8DBQFA75xpld4MRA3gEwYRAiP4AKCRVImXQj4rSk0VhR/VhMbEeb21QgCfWofc |
| 72 |
PMw+3RHNsK+Ec+SU7EMpL38= |
| 73 |
=Rq21 |
| 74 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-- |
| 77 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives