Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Olivier CrĂȘte" <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Topic for Feb council meeting
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:45:56
Message-Id: 1170024136.6898.1.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Topic for Feb council meeting by Mike Doty
1 On Sun, 2007-28-01 at 14:24 -0800, Mike Doty wrote:
2 > The subject of what to do if a council member voluntarily leaves the
3 > council came up at the last meeting. The glep doesn't cover what to do
4 > in this case.
5 >
6 > Here are the options:
7 >
8 > 1. re-elect a whole new council.
9 > 2. elect a new member at a reduced term to fill the vacancy.
10 > 3. take the 8th spot from the last election.
11 >
12 > The spirit of the GLEP would indicate option 2, but it's never spelled
13 > out. Speak out now if you have a opinion on the subject.
14
15 It should definitely be one of 2 or 3. Option 1 is ridiculous. I would
16 personally opt for 3, since it allows the council to keep on functioning
17 properly. Or maybe 3 if there is unanimous approuval from the council or
18 2 otherwise.
19
20 --
21 Olivier CrĂȘte
22 tester@g.o
23 Gentoo Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature