| 1 |
El dom, 14-04-2013 a las 02:24 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:55:39 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:09:05 -0600 |
| 6 |
> > Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > > - Make use of readme.gentoo.eclass to make the user aware of the |
| 9 |
> > > > Gentoo Linux Kernel Upgrade Guide only the first time he emerges |
| 10 |
> > > > the package. Fixes bug #457598. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > Call me crazy, but upgrade guides seem like something you might want |
| 13 |
> > > to tell the user about during an upgrade. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > True, I was wondering if there is a way to show it on their first |
| 16 |
> > upgrade instead; most users would indeed not be able or forget to |
| 17 |
> > bookmark this during their handbook install. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Therefore, I won't commit this patch. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > I wonder if Pacho can adapt the eclass to allow us to do this on the |
| 22 |
> > first upgrade, I have explicitly put him in CC so he can consider that. |
| 23 |
> > Perhaps he can also explain why he wanted to see this change happen. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > I thought the goal of this eclass is to get rid of repeating messages |
| 26 |
> > that are not that important from the elog. After you have installed the |
| 27 |
> > kernel twice you should be able to do it a third time. People that |
| 28 |
> > really still need the link have it either bookmarked or can look into |
| 29 |
> > that file, another concern here is that nothing mentions its existence. |
| 30 |
> > The user would have to spot it in the list of installed files, strange. |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> > If I misunderstood the goal of this eclass, sorry, it's not documented. |
| 33 |
> > I thought people were against these kind of repeating messages in elog. |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > - http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-reference/readme.gentoo.eclass |
| 36 |
> > |
| 37 |
> > - Bug in discussion: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457598 |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Personally I think that the entire idea of only displaying messages on the |
| 40 |
> first install is completely asinine. What exactly is the benefit? Were users |
| 41 |
> complaining that we were being too helpful and they'd like us to hide important |
| 42 |
> messages in random places? |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
When you get tons of messages in summary.log, there are times that is |
| 46 |
easier to ignore important messages over all the less important ones |
Archives