Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Kerberos Maintainence
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:38:31
Message-Id: pan.2008.02.14.14.37.42@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Kerberos Maintainence by Christian Faulhammer
1 Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> posted
2 20080214075828.713c9142@g.o, excerpted below, on Thu, 14 Feb 2008
3 07:58:28 +0100:
4
5 > Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@g.o>:
6 >> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Paul B. Henson wrote:
7
8 >> > he did just have his first baby Monday so it's probably not
9 >> > the top thing on his mind :)...
10 >> Do we have any rough ETA of when we have a maintainer?
11 >
12 > When Heath is finished, he hasn't committed his ebuild quiz yet, so
13 > there is no bug open to follow. Unfortunately he will be limited in
14 > time the next weeks I fear.
15
16 Of course, for such an event, "unfortunately" is a matter of perspective.
17 =8^) Best wishes for the family and the baby, regardless of whether
18 Gentoo ultimately gets a dev or not. Of course, we hope both dad and
19 ultimately kid will be Gentoo devs, but let's remember what's important,
20 here. =8^)
21
22 --
23 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
24 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
25 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list