Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 20:10:12
Message-Id: 20060704220823.5598887b@c1358217.kevquinn.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd by Nick Devito
1 On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:59:12 -0600
2 Nick Devito <nick125@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Yeah, to me, having those in the emulation category just
5 > doesn't...."fit" there, but, that's just me. Maybe we could take xen,
6 > vmware, qemu, and related packages out of app-emulation, and make a
7 > new category, app-virtualization. That would seem to fit a bit better
8 > then emulation.
9
10 Oh; and one more thing - please don't confuse herds with categories.
11 herds are defined by metadata, not the package location in the portage
12 tree. Moving stuff in herds is pretty painless, provided all the
13 relevant maintainers agree - indeed, a package can belong to more than
14 one herd. However changing a package's category is much more
15 disruptive and should be avoided.
16
17 --
18 Kevin F. Quinn

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature