1 |
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 03:41, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 06 February 2004 08:29 pm, Kumba wrote: |
3 |
> > I think there is some thought on LKML to resolve this finally in 2.6, by |
4 |
> > creating a split in the kernel headers, separating out a sanitized set |
5 |
> > of user-space headers and headers intended exclusively for the kernel. |
6 |
> > No idea when this idea might be implemented in 2.6....it might become a |
7 |
> > 2.7 feature. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> i think in the first few test's of 2.6.0 there was a couple of threads that |
10 |
> actually had good things in them about producing a user-space API ... i dont |
11 |
> remember the guy's name, but i saw one post where he cleaned up the API for |
12 |
> some driver as a 'proof of concept' dealie ... |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Adrian Bunk did a cleanup, but as always there was the negative factor |
16 |
on LKML, which shot his stuff totally down. I am not sure if anybody |
17 |
else have done this. |
18 |
|
19 |
There is also a project for 2.6 sanitized headers (like the RH thing), |
20 |
but I heard it is rather a butchering - cannot comment myself though. |
21 |
|
22 |
> but like kumba said, i think the end result was that they want to do this, but |
23 |
> it's going to happen in 2.7 (2.8 for most of us) |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
They have always said they want to do this - even 6-8 months ago when |
27 |
I started a thread about cdrecord. It is however very low priority |
28 |
(and if you really want my opinion, its more an excuse if pressed into |
29 |
and corner than anything else). |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
|
34 |
Martin Schlemmer |
35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
36 |
Cape Town, South Africa |