Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:37:59
Message-Id: 45466FA6.7070102@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
2 > | What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months is
3 > | not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple "we'll only
4 > | support newer versions and don't care about MySQL 4.0.x any more, go
5 > | drop it"?
6 >
7 > Priorities. The arch teams could be too busy dealing with other bugs
8 > that matter more or too busy dealing with noise bugs.
9
10 Sorry, taking 1 minute to respond on a bug after being poked for a
11 couple of months is not a matter of priorities, but mere politeness and
12 common sense. Seriously, you can't work productively with other people
13 if they can't be bothered to write one sentence for months.
14
15
16 --
17 Best regards,
18
19 Jakub Moc
20 mailto:jakub@g.o
21 GPG signature:
22 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
23 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
24
25 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>