Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:02:57
Message-Id: 520CB558.5020400@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree by Markos Chandras
1 On 08/15/2013 03:15 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
2 > On 15 August 2013 00:42, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
4 >>> On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
5 >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
6 >>>>
7 >>>>>>>>> And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
8 >>>>>>>>> progress in gentoo.
9 >>>>>>>>
10 >>>>>>>> Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
11 >>>>>>>
12 >>>>>>> You certainly are not an authority when it comes to that
13 >>>>>>> question...
14 >>>>>>
15 >>>>>> Well no
16 >>>>
17 >>>>> exactly
18 >>>>
19 >>>> Stop it. Now.
20 >>>>
21 >>>> gentoo-dev is a list for technical topics, so please take your
22 >>>> personal quarrels elsewhere.
23 >>>>
24 >>>> Ulrich
25 >>>>
26 >>>
27 >>> Last warning for both hasufell and Ciaran. Keep the discussion on
28 >>> acceptable technical and polite levels or go away
29 >>>
30 >>
31 >> I'm quite surprised that you attack hasufell now for his valid opinion
32 >> that PMS is not well maintained and does not reflect reality adequately.
33 >
34 > I you want to complain about something, do it properly by stating your
35 > opinion in a professional manner
36 > and respect the other participants.
37
38 Stop violently agreeing with me!