Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4 to go ~arch --- ~sparc tests good.
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:36:59
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.61.0412072331460.30420@terciopelo.krait.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4 to go ~arch --- ~sparc tests good. by Georgi Georgiev
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
5
6 > maillog: 08/12/2004-07:52:19(+0900): Georgi Georgiev types
7 >> maillog: 07/12/2004-19:59:05(+0000): Ferris McCormick types
8 >>> 6. NOTE: The two 'is_kernel' tests produce error messages, but (for me,
9 >>> at any rate) ebuild operation is correct anyway. I have not
10 >>> investigated further, but as I recall, the messages were:
11 >>> [: wrong number of arguments (for the check kernel-2.2.x)
12 >>> Command '*' not understood
13 >>
14 >> This is what I had in my overlay while testing the ebuild yesterday.
15 >> The linux-info.eclass kernel_is() should only return an exit code so its
16 >> output should not be looked at. I.e. those "[" and "$(" are not needed.
17 >
18 > Ah, well, linux-info broke in the meantime, that's all.
19 >
20
21 Thanks for the information. For your confusion, there is a 'kernel_is'
22 in linux-info.eclass, and an 'is_kernel' in x11.eclass. The ebuilds
23 used to use is_kernel; now they use kernel_is, and perhaps the
24 difficulties started with that?
25
26
27 Regards,
28 - --
29 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
30 Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc)
31 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
33
34 iD8DBQFBtj6WQa6M3+I///cRAk6iAKCJYpG+ZXeJr0je3W7Wu8CmdPLK1QCgiy0y
35 /RfYqDogLRPD9rRMSgYcHxw=
36 =6A0o
37 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
38
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4 to go ~arch --- ~sparc tests good. Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>