1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> maillog: 08/12/2004-07:52:19(+0900): Georgi Georgiev types |
7 |
>> maillog: 07/12/2004-19:59:05(+0000): Ferris McCormick types |
8 |
>>> 6. NOTE: The two 'is_kernel' tests produce error messages, but (for me, |
9 |
>>> at any rate) ebuild operation is correct anyway. I have not |
10 |
>>> investigated further, but as I recall, the messages were: |
11 |
>>> [: wrong number of arguments (for the check kernel-2.2.x) |
12 |
>>> Command '*' not understood |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> This is what I had in my overlay while testing the ebuild yesterday. |
15 |
>> The linux-info.eclass kernel_is() should only return an exit code so its |
16 |
>> output should not be looked at. I.e. those "[" and "$(" are not needed. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Ah, well, linux-info broke in the meantime, that's all. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks for the information. For your confusion, there is a 'kernel_is' |
22 |
in linux-info.eclass, and an 'is_kernel' in x11.eclass. The ebuilds |
23 |
used to use is_kernel; now they use kernel_is, and perhaps the |
24 |
difficulties started with that? |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
- -- |
29 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
30 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc) |
31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
33 |
|
34 |
iD8DBQFBtj6WQa6M3+I///cRAk6iAKCJYpG+ZXeJr0je3W7Wu8CmdPLK1QCgiy0y |
35 |
/RfYqDogLRPD9rRMSgYcHxw= |
36 |
=6A0o |
37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |