1 |
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 21:22 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> I wonder if with ACCEPT_LICENSES it would be possible to get a way to |
3 |
> represent this issue, like a "unredistributable" fake license, disabled |
4 |
> during GRP building for instance, so that the packages needing that license |
5 |
> wouldn't be built in binary form and redistributed by us. |
6 |
|
7 |
Nope. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Any proposal on this issue? |
10 |
|
11 |
USE=bindist |
12 |
|
13 |
If that is set, then we don't link to libmp4v2, no matter what else USE |
14 |
says. This is how we generally get around issues such as this. It |
15 |
isn't necessarily optimal, but it is the current best solution that we |
16 |
have and it'll match up with our other packages. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Chris Gianelloni |
20 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
21 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
22 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
23 |
Gentoo Foundation |