| 1 |
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:49:07 +0400 |
| 2 |
Alexander V Vershilov <alexander.vershilov@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It seems that in eclasses we have two differenct environment variables |
| 7 |
> with same meaning ESCM and EVCS OFFLINE. Some of eclasses use one and |
| 8 |
> some another: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> find . -type f | xargs grep -l EVCS_OFFLINE |
| 11 |
> ./git-2.eclass |
| 12 |
> ./bzr.eclass |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> find . -type f | xargs grep -l ESCM_OFFLINE |
| 15 |
> ./darcs.eclass |
| 16 |
> ./cvs.eclass |
| 17 |
> ./mercurial.eclass |
| 18 |
> ./git.eclass |
| 19 |
> ./subversion.eclass |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> It seems we should have some concusion about what env variable should |
| 22 |
> be used to prevent downloading of live repo. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I think we agreed on using EVCS_. Quoting ulm: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Coming back to this. As was pointed out in the thread in -dev (almost a |
| 27 |
year ago), these variables should better be named EVCS_*, because SCM |
| 28 |
is ambiguous with the scheme language. The category is called dev-vcs |
| 29 |
too. [1] |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311101 |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Best regards, |
| 35 |
Michał Górny |
Archives