| 1 |
Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'm not sure if I'm misreading here, I'm not advocating we dump older |
| 4 |
> gcc versions. Moreso I'm advocating we dump code that doesn't compile |
| 5 |
> with newer gcc/toolchain versions that no one is willing to fix. We |
| 6 |
> have had devs in the past bring in far too many packages and then just |
| 7 |
> leave, so half of them get picked up by other devs, and the other half |
| 8 |
> sit there and rot. Mostly once again, maintainer-needed packages :0 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sorry, for some reason I reversed the entire meaning of your message to refer to |
| 11 |
packages that build with the current toolchain but not an older one. I blame |
| 12 |
the hangover and the strangely persuasive goat people. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Right now I'm in the middle (well, okay, maybe first quarter) of getting |
| 15 |
everything in stable working with GCC-4.1.1. If (when) I encounter anything |
| 16 |
that makes me run away arms flailing in horror I will be happy to CC |
| 17 |
tree-cleaners (misery loves company) ;). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
--de. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives