Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new ebuild commit/update process with (un)stable?
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:48:11
Message-Id: 200210221648.06080.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] new ebuild commit/update process with (un)stable? by Dave Nellans
1 its all the same portage tree ...
2 variables and the mask file are how we currently create
3 these 3 levels. 'stable' is x86, 'unstable' is ~x86, 'broken'
4 is the mask file. the end user, without modifications to
5 their setup, is at the stable level
6 -mike
7
8 On Tuesday 22 October 2002 03:20 pm, Dave Nellans wrote:
9 > now that gentoo has stable/unstable can someone let me know where masked
10 > ebuilds now fit into this process? i haven't heard any good
11 > explainations of how the system is supposed to work now with three
12 > levels before it hits an "end" user.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] new ebuild commit/update process with (un)stable? Dave Nellans <dnellans@×××××××.edu>