| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 4. Januar 2006 09:16 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> <ext-dirk.heinrichs@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | So my question is: Would it be a good idea to generally turn GCC into |
| 5 |
> | split ebuilds (like KDE/X.org)? Pros/Cons? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Sure, that'd be nice. It's also impossible, but don't let that stop you |
| 8 |
> from trying. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Could you explain why it is impossible? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
However, my point is not trying to force GCC into split ebuilds, but rather |
| 13 |
having the GCC suite installed in a consistant manner. I don't like the |
| 14 |
idea of having a couple of languages in one ebuild, while other languages |
| 15 |
are installed via their own ebuild. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
IMHO it would be easier for the end user (like me) to either install GCC |
| 18 |
with one ebuild, enabling the languages I want via USE flags, or have one |
| 19 |
ebuild for each language, but not one ebuild for a handful of languages and |
| 20 |
separated ebuilds for each of the others. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Bye... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Dirk |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 |
| 27 |
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 |
| 28 |
Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: dirk.heinrichs@×××××××××.com |
| 29 |
Hambornerstraße 55 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com |
| 30 |
D-40472 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 |
| 31 |
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net |
Archives