Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] comments on how flamewars are handled elsewhere
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:12:02
Message-Id: 20070308180651.GA4477@tonatiuh.pureserver.info
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] comments on how flamewars are handled elsewhere by expose@luftgetrock.net
1 On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:50:11PM +0100, expose@×××××××××××.net wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > to place my personal opinion, too but seperated from information/facts:
5 >
6 > I feel like a netiquette should be developed, people who break it too often
7 > should be warned, then banned.
8 > When the situation normalizes again, there will be no banning anymore anyway
9 > automatically.
10 >
11 > Would be nice to know how others feel, wether something should be changed or
12 > (why) not, and if so, what ideas are like.
13 >
14 > Doing this quick overview showed (even though I never mentioned Gentoo myself)
15 > that the message of Gentoo and it's mailinglists spreaded quickly on IRC,
16 > which is something else I dislike to see...
17 >
18
19 Please could you stop attempting to create new threads by replying to
20 existing emails to the list? It's considered bad netiquette and
21 generally makes new threads difficult to spot. The list is hard enough
22 to parse as it is, without this added hindrance.
23
24 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking has the details if it is
25 something you're unaware of.
26
27 Tom

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] comments on how flamewars are handled elsewhere Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>