| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Instead of virtual/wine, perhaps virtual/win32 would be better? After all, |
| 5 |
Gentoo Windows (aka Gentoo Cygwin) would probably use the actual Win32 |
| 6 |
libraries and not a WINE... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Thursday 10 July 2003 02:33 am, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 9 |
> Alex Veber wrote: [Wed Jul 09 2003, 04:27:41PM EDT] |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > currently Gentoo provides wine, winex, winex-cvs and nwwine, 4 |
| 12 |
> > diffrent versions of wine. because some apps depend/will depend on |
| 13 |
> > wine to work and even to compile, I would like to propose the creation |
| 14 |
> > of virtual/wine. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Are they really equivalent to the wine drinkers? For example, the |
| 17 |
> providers of virtual/smtp are equivalent programs to all the programs |
| 18 |
> requiring /usr/lib/sendmail to exist. Are the consumers of wine |
| 19 |
> ambivalent to which vintage is installed? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Aron |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- -- |
| 27 |
Luke-Jr |
| 28 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 29 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iD8DBQE/DkrzZl/BHdU+lYMRAhcbAJ9Nr+iflxCk+MZXcTlseH7mK2LwcQCfSpZR |
| 34 |
eRINkFXgbNsGrpyytoxnzMo= |
| 35 |
=VHor |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives