| 1 |
On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I don't agree for hard-masked packages. Sometimes they are hard-masked |
| 4 |
> because of being under development, and are changed several times |
| 5 |
> until |
| 6 |
> unmasked (think about new KDE versions etc). Revbumping with each |
| 7 |
> change |
| 8 |
> and then finally unmasking something like -r15 is nuissance and looks |
| 9 |
> weird. Users shouldn't be using p.masked packages and if they do, they |
| 10 |
> should really know what they are doing, especially when filling |
| 11 |
> bugs for |
| 12 |
> such packages as there are no guarantees while in p.mask. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Okay, I understand that. Just keep in mind, that order bugs to the |
| 15 |
ebuilds might be more difficult without changing the version number. |
| 16 |
And the guidelines say, if an ebuild is changed the version number |
| 17 |
i.e. -rx should be increased. |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives