Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:18:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20150421071823.1538fdd6@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug? by grozin@gentoo.org | ||
| 1 | On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) |
| 2 | grozin@g.o wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the |
| 5 | > user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | There is your problem. We filter out those compiler flags that affect |
| 8 | the output, so -O3 should go (and e.g. -Wall could stay). |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | jer |