Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Cc: | licenses <licenses@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | ||
| Date: | Sat, 21 Sep 2019 23:21:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38F+K2QPHz1A-Rq21X4BQBVx2TrYGryA8A5A=SF44mq-xA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing by Matt Turner |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:57 AM Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:09 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having |
| 5 | > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's |
| 6 | > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > I think that's a good idea. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | An idea to consider: use SPDX license identifiers (see |
| 11 | https://spdx.org/licenses/) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | For GPL 2 they are "GPL-2.0-only" and "GPL-2.0-or-later" |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |