1 |
Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> I see no reason to stick with libav as default, except political |
3 |
> (which I'm trying to avoid here). |
4 |
|
5 |
It's very convenient to try to ignore politics, but IMO that's no |
6 |
better in open source than on election day. A default is always a |
7 |
political choice. |
8 |
|
9 |
With any choice, the mainstream option is obviously more convenient, |
10 |
but that doesn't make it right, only convenient. I've found that the |
11 |
mainstream option is actually much more likely to be wrong. |
12 |
|
13 |
To spell it out: I consider distributions to have a moral duty to |
14 |
make informed political choices, also for overridable defaults, for |
15 |
the benefit of users who don't bother making a choice themselves. |
16 |
|
17 |
It's obvious that the world can be ruled with instant gratification. |
18 |
|
19 |
It's further obvious to me that settling for what seems good in the |
20 |
short-term may not really benefit anyone. |
21 |
|
22 |
I think Gentoo needs to be explicitly and consciously political about |
23 |
defaults. Competitors deserve no less than to be chosen or not chosen |
24 |
based on their actual merits rather than popularity. Not making an |
25 |
informed political choice is lame. |
26 |
|
27 |
But whatever. Neither Gentoo nor the rest of the world runs on facts |
28 |
or even right and wrong, so carry on. :) |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
//Peter |