Archives
Archives
| From: | Josh Sled <jsled@××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 May 2007 17:10:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 59846.127.0.0.1.1179421656.squirrel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Thu, May 17, 2007 12:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > 'Twas added to the tree at user request. Given that Java's basically a |
| 3 | > dead language and only being used for legacy applications now, it's |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how you justify calling Java a |
| 6 | dead language. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | ...jsled |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |