Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:47:40
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41XYknK2n=DiXWSETodQAx-2MU6DTr3uqWfhs3L1B_U_g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposal for consistency between {RUBY,PYTHON,PHP}_TARGETS by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
2 <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote:
3 > On 24/11/2012 10:19, Peter Stuge wrote:
4 >> Diego, remember the original point. It is obvious that a common
5 >> syntax is more coherent and thus easier for the world to understand.
6 >> Having that would be a good thing. It is also obvious that the ruby
7 >> syntax is problematic in the general case.
8 >
9 > And the Ruby syntax has been devised to suit the _installed commands_
10 > for the most part: ruby18 and ruby19 are _the commands you run_.
11 >
12
13 Makes sense to me.
14
15 We are (almost) doing the same for python, but we can't have periods
16 in USE flag names. The underscore is a convenient replacement.
17
18 I suppose we could use a hyphen like php does, but I don't think it is
19 worth the effort at this point.

Replies