Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 19:42:42
Message-Id: 20060517191619.GD8220@superlupo.rechner
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:34:52PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:11:57 +0200 Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 > | That's not the point as i wasn't talking about single developers but
5 > | Gentoo as an organisation. Paludis is not in any way under Gentoo's
6 > | control. If the paludis devs decide to change the license for paludis
7 > | 1.0 to a commercial one, Gentoo would be unable do anything about it
8 > | (except fork the last GPLed version).
9 >
10 > And what if the Bash licence changes? Or the Python licence?
11
12 That's a bit different as these are dependencies. Paludis has those too.
13 Let's concentrate on the package manager - and as said there is no way
14 for Gentoo to have any influence on paludis.
15
16 > | If the paludis devs decide to
17 > | terminate all ricers with RTFM, Gentoo can't do anything about it. I
18 > | guess the list could be continued with other examples.
19 > | I'm not saying the paludis devs may do such a thing, but they could
20 > | and Gentoo couldn't do anything about it.
21 >
22 > Yes, and the Bash developers *could* decide to make new Bash versions
23 > print out an ASCII art diagram of a BSD daemon sporking Larry.
24
25 Please don't turn this in another pink elephant argument.
26
27 > | As long a project is within Gentoo, every developer does at least have
28 > | some influence, be it by voting the council or whatsoever.
29 >
30 > And just what do you think would happen if the council were to demand
31 > that Portage implements a new feature?
32
33 Depends - but more than if it demands a new paludis feature.
34
35 > | As for your long standing feature requests, this has nothing to do
36 > | with the issue, unless you're trying to bash the portage team, which
37 > | has nothing to do with this thread.
38 >
39 > Sure it does. It's a perfect demonstration that the needs and demands
40 > of Gentoo have no influence over what happens to Portage.
41
42 Sorry, but all i see is bashing portage, and i don't really like it.
43
44 cheers,
45 Wernfried
46
47 --
48 Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
49 Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
50 IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org