Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:33:14
Message-Id: 20120605212815.079db021@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue by "Aaron W. Swenson"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:44:08 -0400
"Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> wrote:
> "There's never anything important in all that text." - Anonymous > Gentoo User
To be fair, most einfo and elog messages are useless spam. When elog was introduced, it was supposed to be only for *important* messages, but nearly everything sent to it now is a waste of users' time. Perhaps the solution is to implement an ethisisimportanthonestlog function, and require developers to get approval before using it, as per news items. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/Oa+MACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHDhwCgpf1C/k//ecx21gcsCiCy6MK1 GRwAoNhvMaJSFxAbTdOGcqMcYhI5JuXN =SNPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----