Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:25:17
Message-Id: 1794534.0xJHuh4lKC@crazyhorse
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams by Rolf Eike Beer
On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) <y..> for package <x>" interface, > > > > that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then once > > the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or > > determined automatically when sub-work was completed and reducing the > > published list automatically, and then responded to potential issues > > based on changes in git, ( as opposed to being only triggered when > > the bug was touched ) > > As someone who does both keywordings and stabilizations regularly on hppa > and sparc I think I must share a bit of my experiences:
<snip> hppa is making us keep old kernels around [1]. Should the kernel team be doing more to get your attention then CC'ing hppa on all of the kernel STABLEREQ bugs [2]? [1] https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/700416 Mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de>